Welcome, Guest. Please Login 3dfx Archive
 
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
AAlchemy 8164 (Read 1909 times)
MaxPain
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


AAAAARG!

Posts: 14
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #30 - 24.08.08 at 21:41:49
 
Hey all. I just acquired one of these lovely beasts as well! After some time of bidding on them, one going for over $400, I got one for $38 Happy Auction was for an 8132, but I received an 8164, so SHH! However that was all my extra spending cash I had and the PSU that went just a few days ago was $45. I suspect that it had a much higher bid on it than that though, so I wouldn't have even had close to enough since LogicalMadness' (Ben) has one up and it's going for $199 starting :\

So basically I'm in the same boat as everyone here, except Gary Angry You bassturd! Wink

So here's my thoughts: Could Gary provide the amps under load with 16xAA. The gauge(diameter) of the power wires leading to the power-board from the PSU and maybe if they get hot like m14?

As for drivers: I'm also in need of some since Q3D's site is not allowing us access due to a server move (it seems). And on that note, since we have the 3Dfx source code now (I have it if anyone wants it, it's like 50mb compressed), could we some how modify the Q3D drivers to work in XP, or maybe even make some new drivers based on 6K's? Or at the very least somehow improve on Q3D's 2K drivers for better quality or speed?

Then also my board has the "Sensor Post Processor" (SPP from here out) card which has dual DVI ports on it, basically from my reading it's almost a Physics card, but it adds 'realism' to the military apps. Such as the grainy video while using night vision. Is that ALL it does, or does it also act as a 2D card? It has a G/VPU with 4 chips of SGR (or whatever some V3s came with). Yet that might solely be for the post processing. Even if it does still need a 2D card, would I need to hook up my monitor to the 8164 card? The SPP connects to the 8164 via Q3D's usual board-to-board connectors (interconnects?), so I'm thinking maybe I just need to run that card to my monitor. Sadly that'll only mean I need a bigger PSU, but in the long run I can hook it up to a really nice LCD monitor Grin

So, to sum all this up: Can Gary give us max-load amps being drawn, wire gauge? Possible to modify 3Dfx source to work with these cards for XP, or improve things? Anyone have a link for drivers for me? Can my SPP card double as a 2D card?

And on a final note, while it's 4 years old, this guy got things started with a 550W, but essentially is in the same boat as us.

http://www.3dfxzone.it/enboard/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=738
Back to top
 
MaxPain burban502  
IP Logged
 
gdonovan
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Infernal Collector

Posts: 2361
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #31 - 25.08.08 at 03:55:52
 


> So here's my thoughts: Could Gary provide the amps under load with 16xAA.

8x, there is no option for 16x.

Actually there is a formula for figuring amp load from watts and voltage. Since I already have supplied the watts pulled, should be just a matter of punching in the numbers.

> As for drivers: I'm also in need of some since Q3D's site is not allowing us access due to a server move (it seems).

I can help there once my main machines data is recovered.

> And on that note, since we have the 3Dfx source code now (I have it if anyone wants it, it's like 50mb compressed), could we some how modify the Q3D drivers to work in XP, or maybe even make some new drivers based on 6K's?

The AA5 boards have a different power up routine than the V6k, you would have to get the source from Q3D.

Back to top
 

Rampage is alive!
 
IP Logged
 
MaxPain
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


AAAAARG!

Posts: 14
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #32 - 25.08.08 at 05:11:28
 
So why aren't we able to select 16xAA when a Q3D graph showed these cards fillrate under 16x? EDIT: Hard to read what it says after "16", hell it's all hard to read, but here's that graph. http://www.hardwareportal.ru/Technologies/Heavymetal/Diagram1.gif

Is the driver file bid_08CD-Release_4.6? I managed to get it from Q3D's site (more digging than I figured). They have a live link still @ http://www.quantum3d.com/old/support/aalchemy/bid_08CD-Release_4.6.zip This one driver site (which I'm sure is sorely wrong) says these are XP compatible... Being a 04 release, I don't find that to be too far fetched but.. anyone tried?

Was your wattage pulled from a FULL system load, or just the cards draw? What's the easiest way to "down volt" a 3.3v line to 2.7/2.9? (which ever my card needs, it's in it's anti-static bag and I don't feel like pulling it out) EDIT: 217.5 watts is 75A @ 2.9v. 202.5 watts is 75A @ 2.7v. Problem now is how do I find out the max Amps a PSU can handle? 3.3v rails only support around 28A (on a PSU I looked up quick on NewEgg). So is that 75A rail so high to run both the whole system AND the card? Or a PSU they made for the 82xx rigs as well as 81xx, and we don't really need all that? And you mentioned 290w @ 120v. So are we not supposed to factor the 2.7/2.9 into the math, but 120v from the wall?

I suppose Hank wouldn't be willing to part with old Q3D VSA driver source either lol

And no idea about this Sensor Post Processor card, eh Gary?
Back to top
« Last Edit: 25.08.08 at 05:38:46 by MaxPain »  
MaxPain burban502  
IP Logged
 
m14radu
God Member
*****
Offline


Take your chance !

Posts: 555
Timisoara, Romania
Gender: male
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #33 - 25.08.08 at 11:59:59
 
Yes, i have the same driver.
And yes, i tried this driver on XP, and it's not working.

In the Readme file is written that the driver is for NT and win2000.
Back to top
 
WWW m14radu  
IP Logged
 
gdonovan
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Infernal Collector

Posts: 2361
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #34 - 25.08.08 at 12:06:12
 
>So why aren't we able to select 16xAA when a Q3D graph showed these cards fillrate under 16x?

I'm just reporting what is being shown in the driver panel, don't shoot the messenger.

> Is the driver file bid_08CD-Release_4.6?

I'd have to recover my hard drive before I can answer that question.

> Was your wattage pulled from a FULL system load, or just the cards draw?

Full system- You just need to calculate based on the difference under load/no load. It will be close enough I suspect.

Calculate 100 watts @120 volts and you should be safe.

> I suppose Hank wouldn't be willing to part with old Q3D VSA driver source either lol

Everyone at Q3D is skittish after the Chinese guy got tossed in jail for peddling nvsensor software and other Q3d data to places in Asia.

Don't bet on anyone there helping on that.

> And no idea about this Sensor Post Processor card, eh Gary?

I don't have any further data at the moment.

Back to top
 

Rampage is alive!
 
IP Logged
 
MaxPain
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


AAAAARG!

Posts: 14
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #35 - 25.08.08 at 14:13:18
 
heh I'm not shooting the messenger, I didn't even mean to come across as a smart ass, sorry if it did. Just found it odd that it's not selectable.  Huh Seeing as it's double a V5 6K and it does 8x :\

Sadly I guess I'm still a bit confused on how to accurately calculate the required power needed. What I plan to do is run a dedicated PSU for the 8164. That way I can change the 3.3v or 5v rail to 2.9v (I'm sure mines 2.9v). If it only needs 100w, I'm thinking then that the 28-35A that a PSU provides for the 3.3 or 5v rails will be enough.

Like this, here's how I'm stuck:

"The conversion of Volts to Amps is governed by the equations Amps = Watts/Volts
For example 120 watts/110 volts = 1.09 amps"

Based on your 100W and 110V info, that's .909090~ amps. Now, use 2.9 as the voltage and you get 34.48A, which sounds much better, no?

If that IS the case, there is this one (no idea on the quality of these for how long they'll last, but since they'd only be used under novelty conditions might not matter.)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817182006

Or this one for much cheaper
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817255011

Both have 35A on the 5v rail which we could regulate down to 2.7/2.9v and then be .4A above what the calculated usage is.

PS: I have a Medusa cable still, can/should I use that for this card?
Back to top
« Last Edit: 25.08.08 at 19:12:53 by MaxPain »  
MaxPain burban502  
IP Logged
 
gamma742
God Member
*****
Offline


3Dfx Gamer

Posts: 1668
San Diego, CA  USA
Gender: male
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #36 - 26.08.08 at 05:56:43
 
MaxPain wrote on 25.08.08 at 14:13:18:
PS: I have a Medusa cable still, can/should I use that for this card?



Medusa?? on a AAlchemy??? You must be thinking of a Q3D Mercury System.
Back to top
 

Quantum3D AAlchemy 3 Channel SwapLock/SyncLock System.  Powered by VSA 100 GPUs Running in SLI Mode. 3dfx at it's Best......
gamma742 https://www.facebook.com/bob.waller  
IP Logged
 
MaxPain
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


AAAAARG!

Posts: 14
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #37 - 26.08.08 at 17:49:45
 
hah Yea. I for some reason, thought I read in the thread here that these only do 3D. Why, I don't know -_- Talk about a brain fart heh
Back to top
 
MaxPain burban502  
IP Logged
 
m14radu
God Member
*****
Offline


Take your chance !

Posts: 555
Timisoara, Romania
Gender: male
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #38 - 27.08.08 at 07:07:13
 
I tryed some schematics - take a look here.

http://www.voodoo3dfx.com/Foro_V6k/viewtopic.php?t=105
Back to top
 
WWW m14radu  
IP Logged
 
MaxPain
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


AAAAARG!

Posts: 14
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #39 - 27.08.08 at 07:36:42
 
m14radu wrote on 27.08.08 at 07:07:13:
I tryed some schematics - take a look here.

http://www.voodoo3dfx.com/Foro_V6k/viewtopic.php?t=105


Hey bud, I'm pretty sure that your problem is you're only supplying 1 bank of VSAs. Apparently they are what take the 2.9v and since there are 2-sets of 4, there are 2 points for 2.9v. You're only supplying 1 point with 2.9v and the other is getting nothing. So either 1) The card is dividing up the 2.9v for both banks and that's why there's so little voltage 2) The card is only having 4 of the 8 VSA's powered and that's why it's not displaying things right AND coming back with an error during testing.

Solution: Take your second PSU you had (or it seemed like you were using 2 in Method 2) and run it to the back 2.9v. Also, I'd take the 5v off both and step it down to the 2.9v and use the 3.3v for the actual 3.3v. Why you might ask? Well because the 5v rail itself has a higher amp output than the 3.3v rail. We need all we can get after all Smiley And if it takes 2 PSU's to get this beauty working, then so be it! The one i linked on NewEgg is only $15 anyways Tongue $30 is a mighty cheap AA5 PSU! Grin

EDIT: Possible problem #2, and picture to help explain what I mean for you to try.

Now, in addition to not supplying the 2nd point with 2.9v, I think maybe the resistor might not be allowing enough amps through it, but I'm not an electrician, so I can't exactly answer that with certainty. My problem when I was trying to find a regulator, was that they could only handle a certain amount of amps. What size resistor are you using to step-down the voltage to 2.9?

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: 27.08.08 at 07:45:23 by MaxPain »  
MaxPain burban502  
IP Logged
 
m14radu
God Member
*****
Offline


Take your chance !

Posts: 555
Timisoara, Romania
Gender: male
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #40 - 27.08.08 at 08:56:35
 
Well, the 2.9V points are connected together throught the Power board.
So that it's enought to supply one point !

The reason why i thake the 5 V Line and convert to 2.9V is becouse of the high ampere output that are available there. ( on 5V line i get 44 AMp, on 3.3V i get 38 A ).   Wink

I think that the problem is the used resistor, witch is not able to handle enought amps. There is no size marked on the resistor i used.

Why don't we take a look inside of a original AAlchemy PSU, in order to see what components we need ? 

P.S. I supply also the second 2.9V point, and nothing change.

There must exist also a 2.7V or 2.9V voltage regulator, witch will make the whole schematichs easyer. ( like for example LM7805 for 5 V )
Back to top
« Last Edit: 27.08.08 at 09:51:33 by m14radu »  
WWW m14radu  
IP Logged
 
gdonovan
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Infernal Collector

Posts: 2361
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #41 - 27.08.08 at 11:41:30
 
m14radu wrote on 27.08.08 at 08:56:35:
I think that the problem is the used resistor, witch is not able to handle enought amps.



I would not be surprised, if it was that easy then Quantum3D would have gone that route.

Quote:
Why don't we take a look inside of a original AAlchemy PSU, in order to see what components we need ?  



There is a second full size PSU in an AV4 Power supply dedicated just for AA5 board output.

Back to top
 

Rampage is alive!
 
IP Logged
 
m14radu
God Member
*****
Offline


Take your chance !

Posts: 555
Timisoara, Romania
Gender: male
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #42 - 27.08.08 at 12:55:18
 
@ Gary: would it be possible to makes some Fotos of the AA5 PSU interior ?

That would be great !

Back to top
 
WWW m14radu  
IP Logged
 
MaxPain
YaBB Newbies
*
Offline


AAAAARG!

Posts: 14
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #43 - 27.08.08 at 18:31:38
 
That's quite the PSU you have if it does 44A! If you split the amperage in 1/2 from what the AV4 says on it, that pretty much puts you in the zone for having the right amount of amps to supply. Assuming the other 30~ is for the system.
Back to top
 
MaxPain burban502  
IP Logged
 
m14radu
God Member
*****
Offline


Take your chance !

Posts: 555
Timisoara, Romania
Gender: male
Re: AAlchemy 8164
Reply #44 - 28.08.08 at 10:54:52
 
What value should must have the Resistor / Potentiometer ?

Back to top
 
WWW m14radu  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print